I am writing in regard to the proposed development of 58 townhouse units on 70 Arlington Dr. Many of the residents of Akinsdale have already made it clear that they are strongly opposed to a development of this magnitude simply because there will be a negative impact on traffic, noise, green space and property values. Keep in mind that some of the residents that back on to 70 Arlington would have as many as five of the townhouse units bordering their property; this is a lot to ask of any homeowner.
I did attend the information session in Grandin mall and raised the question of how the developer plans on enforcing an “owner occupied” condominium bylaw in the homes that are not Habitat for Humanity units. It was clear that none of the speakers had an answer. Even if there was some stipulation made initially, condominium associations can make and change rules as they see fit. The fact that these units are modestly built and priced makes them extremely attractive to property companies and investors looking for revenue property. It will only be a matter of a few years before this housing development becomes mostly rental property. This will introduce a whole new set of issues.
Another area of contention is the figures and arguments put forth by Stantec. According to Mr. Young, having an additional 100 or so vehicles will only raise Arlington Drive traffic one per cent. If 100 vehicles constitutes one per cent that would mean that Arlington Drive sees 10,000 vehicles daily. This is absolutely false. I find this alarming because I don’t know what other figures are being manipulated.
There are so many arguments that support the opposition of this development dating back to when Akinsdale was originally developed right on up to how this development would impact the current community. On the other hand, the only arguments in favour of this development seem to be that St. Albert needs more affordable housing and more tax revenue.
Is it not odd that a lower-income family would live in a community with significantly higher property taxes when compared to surrounding communities? This is something that doesn’t make any sense. It seems that the money these families save on their dwelling will ultimately be squandered by paying hefty property taxes. In the end, from one point of view, it seems the only argument in favour of this development is more tax revenue.
Leo Sanelli, St. Albert
